Suspicions of the Use of a Surrogate Start to Surround Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

Note: Due to the fact that a commission has still not properly investigated the death of Nurse Jacintha and there is no new information, the Royal Gossip Psychotic is not going to write about the tragic death until there is a clear conclusion and all facts are made public. This is to avoid offending the family, jeopardizing the good memory of the nurse, and to also avoid any lawsuits by the neurotic hysterics in the palace.

            After the 2012 topless scandal in France, a scandal that had dominated worldwide media and had usurped coverage of the ducal couple’s trip to the Far East (on behalf of the Queen to celebrate the milestone of the Diamond Jubilee); after the tour the ducal couple returned to England, Kate to her family, and William (presumably) to the palace to explain himself. He had then (so it is believed) to have traveled with friends on a hunting trip when the news of Kate’s hospitalization broke. After a few days he hurried to the bedside of his wife, where he presumably received the joyous news of his wife’s pregnancy. After her family visited, Kate was soon released and returned home to the palace.

 

The circumstances surrounding the pregnancy are odd and certain behavior by the Duchess suggest that something was hidden behind closed doors by the ducal couple. The pregnancy was announced just after the news burst that the Duchess had been rushed to the hospital for an emergency set of medical treatment. It wasn’t until a few days later that Duchess Kate had been expecting for the past couple of weeks and was suffering from Hyperemesis Gravidarium (commonly known as “HG” the term I will use for the article), a medical condition a small percentage of pregnant women suffer from. The illness causes excessive vomiting, watery bowels, triggering dehydration that does often result in hospitalization and emergency treatment to avoid death. Pregnant women who are afflicted are encouraged to get bed rest and often vomiting can become almost hourly.

 

            Despite the serious nature of the illness and the known fact that it takes a serious toll on the weight and appetite of the sufferer, Kate had performed a duty at an awards ceremony for athletes who had performed in the Olympics and straightaway after traveled to the island of Mustique for a vacation in the tropical paradise. This put doubt into the minds of people who had previously been sympathetic to her presumed condition. Sufferers of HG stated flatly that when they had suffered from the syndrome, they had been bedridden for weeks, if not full months and had had to stay near the bathroom to throw up and frequently had to (in one extreme case) avoid sunlight to avoid triggering a bout of vomiting. Others mentioned how they were unable to go out and about and Kate’s oddly carefree, almost cavalier recovery was the first odd sign that the Duchess was oddly robust enough for a vacation, but unable to handle a public appearance. She stayed for a total of two weeks.

 

During the vacation someone managed to snap a photo of the Duchess while walking on the beach with William and people already began to comment about how her ‘bump’ was nothing more than a slight curve, like the bloat that most get when they are full from eating, nothing like that of a pregnant woman with only six months to go. The published photo triggered threats of lawsuits and other forms of legal retaliation, but the seed of doubt that had been planted (from the Duchess’ seeming quick recovery from HG) began to sprout. She provoked severer criticism for taking a vacation, during a time when the palace had announced that the Duchess would be lowering the number of appearances for the sake of her health and to nurture her pregnancy.

 

As time went by and the number of appearances dwindled, the Duchess became a focus for the paparazzi who photographed her shopping, dining, strolling about the city as her pregnancy progressed. Despite the growth of her belly, the Duchess did not alter her habit of wearing wedges and stiletto heels (two favorite forms of footwear for the Duchess) and the rest of her body did not fill out as the months passed. She spent much of her time also enjoying unusually balanced posture and wore her favorite skinny jeans, something many pregnant women set aside for their pregnancy and opt for pants with a stretched waistband and there were rumors of the inconsistency in the size of her belly. People whispered that the Duchess was watching her weight and dieting, even though pregnant women are encouraged to gain weight to properly feed the developing child and she continued to wear decidedly non-maternity tailored clothing.

 

The months progressed and the Duchess slowly but surely eliminated her appearances and it’s now known that much of her time was spent with her family at the new manor house in Berkshire. In mid-July the speculation in Britain reached fever pitch as the due date approached, but it soon passed and fresh calculations were made. The timeline provided by the palace was how the due date was measured and agreed upon, but as two weeks passed, nothing happened. The press and public waited around patiently while the Duchess waited for her labor to begin, while in Berkshire with a helicopter on standby. After a few more days, as the press began to express impatience and borderline disgust, the Duchess was rushed via a back entrance to the hospital and her labor began.

 

After over ten hours, the Duchess was believed to have given birth to a baby boy, who was named Prince George and the nation rejoiced with magazine covers and jubilation. The way the birth was done, according to royal protocol that ensures that the heir is born ‘of the body’ of the legitimate wife, requires that the Home Secretary be present during the birth as an official witness on behalf of the royal family. That the birth was explained as simply overdue and that the Duchess was rushed to the hospital within days of the Home Secretary’s absence (the Home Secretary travels with the Court) is convenient if the couple wanted to bypass the presence of the secretary; the couple is legend for violating protocol, but this particular procedure is done to prevent any challenge to the legitimacy of the heir, for example, questionable parentage.

 

Suddenly, the couple hurried back to Berkshire with their newborn son and suddenly an inside drama was played out. Despite the usual protocol of the Queen being the first to visit after the birth, the couple retreated to Middleton Manor for the Duchess to recuperate and because the Queen was at Balmoral at the time of the birth, the Queen was unable to meet her great-grandson for several weeks. No members of the royal family called upon the Middleton family to offer congratulations and see the infant, a first sign that all was not well between the palace and the Cambridge couple. Despite the possible expectations of the Middletons and ducal couple, the Sovereign did not interrupt her holiday to arrive back at Buckingham Palace or travel to Berkshire to see the newest addition to her family. It was touted as Kate wanting to be around her family, to spend time with her son so her family could be the first, but the palace didn’t react and it was a chillingly indifferent response to the birth of a royal prince. It was as if little George wasn’t important to the royal family and that in and of itself was a sign that something was terribly wrong about the circumstances of the birth.

 

The first candid photo of the Duchess was snapped exiting a grocery store with her cart filled to the brim with frozen food and alcohol, she looked drastically different from the slightly full-bellied new mother who had just had a child. She looked rail thin, wearing her trademark tight skinny jeans and a blouse with a sweater. If the Duchess was feeding her son breast milk, to add alcohol to her diet would in fact be introducing alcohol into her newly born child, which would a horrific act for a new mother. William moved quickly to establish the boundaries he expected the press to abide by. He threatened the media with the full force of the law and instead of an interview talking about his happiness as a new father with Kate by his side; there was complete silence. Over the next couple of weeks Prince William made cryptic comments about his son, but there was nothing definitive described about George. There were no talks about the child’s physical features or anything of substance, just occasional asides mentioned during appearances. During that time, the couple had a set of photos done, surprising in their informality taken by Michael and Michael was granted the rights to the photos, ensuring the complete ownership of the royalties that the photo would generate would benefit the Middleton family.

 

Physiologically the Duchess has shown little effects of a strenuous labor, culminating in the birth of a nine-pound child. The Duchess’ boyish figure has been a trademark of her persona and fashion status, but even the most open minded supporter would be hard pressed to think that a woman who has given a full natural birth to a nine pound child could so quickly begin wearing form fitting skinny jeans and not cause possible health problems, in addition to the fact that it takes a long time for women to recuperate from the pain of having given birth. To lose weight quickly and go back to her natural weight in a short period of time is considered completely impossible. Strained muscles, sagging skin, and stretch marks would be evident and at her recent engagement she was snapped as her shirt flew up as she participated in a small sports event and has ended up showing that she has not been affected physically by her pregnancy, if at all.

 

Previously not even considered, the Duke and Duchess are coming under a cloud of suspicion by various Internet writers about the possibility that they used a surrogate to carry and bear Prince George. Various Internet theorists are writing about the possibility that Duchess Kate did not conceive and carry her own son. Even commentary in the comments section of the Daily Mail has a comment on occasion mocking the idea that Duchess Kate was even pregnant. When the engagement was announced, there was an interview with the couple that was then beaming about the impending nuptials and talking about the circumstances of the proposal and their future plans. Interestingly, there was no interview after the announcement of the pregnancy and there has not been any formal interview so the nation could be told of the newborn heir, the third in line. This is also a different way of things being done and the ducal couple has raised new suspicions.

Advertisements
84 comments
  1. marion said:

    I agree with most of this and wish the press would print it but I think it unlikely for a long time if ever due to the restricitions being placed after the Leveson inquiry and legal threats fro the royal familly.
    However it is not accurate to say the Queen did not meet the baby for several weeks – she was not at Balmoral at the time of George’s birth and did visit Kensington Palace to the baby before willy and wiaty went to middleton manor. Prince Charles visited the hospital and saw george there.

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      The RF can threaten the British press, but I think the international media will be the first to break the news.

      • marion said:

        so do I for obvious reasons

  2. marion said:

    I agree with most of this but it is not wholly accurate – the Queen was not at Balmoral when George was born and she did not have to wait several weeks to see George – she visited him and his parents at Kensington Palace when they came out of hospital when he was a day or two old. Prince Charles vsitied whem while they were still in hospital

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      I’m going to be doing a part II for this piece, mainly since I realize I got a timeline wrong and this will be a kind of ongoing thing.

  3. test2013 said:

    For once we can read some no-nonsense high quality material.
    THANK YOU.
    All of this is like very bad Karma and history repeating itself :
    one Duke abdication paved the way for a Queen.

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      Your welcome.

      I look forward to writing more and I have realized just how hungry the public is for stuff that doesn’t insult their intelligence.

  4. cate said:

    I agree her rapid return to syph-like figure is odd – but the one question I do have regarding the theory of a surrogate is why? Consider the risks – if discovered – and such a conspiracy would involve several people so the risk of someone getting pangs of conscience is very high – it would mean the end of the monarchy – absolutely no getting around this. Why take such a risk? To preserve her figure? Absurd idea. Because she is infertile? Possibly but again – there are treatments for infertility – even up to harvesting an egg from her sister so the child could pass muster if a DNA test occurs. I just see no plausible reason for them to take such an extreme risk – whatever the consequences of Kate failing to have a child might be – the consequences of discovery are so much worse.

    So – please – a motive!!

    I add a few other things – the Home Secretary’s presence at a royal birth is no longer required – the law was changed in 1948 I believe. And the recent midriff baring photos of Kate failed to show a linea nigra. 75% of all females have this line from pubis to under the breasts – the exceptions are usually blonde or red haired woman. The line persists for up to 9 months after giving birth. Granted – she may have been eating tons of spinach to eliminate the line or she could be part of the 25% who do not have it – but……….

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      I’m working on a second part to this piece as I type. You’ll love it!

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      recent midriff baring photos of Kate failed to show a linea nigra. 75% of all females have this line from pubis to under the breasts – the exceptions are usually blonde or red haired woman. The line persists for up to 9 months after giving birth. Granted – she may have been eating tons of spinach to eliminate the line or she could be part of the 25% who do not have it – but……….

      Thanks for the information I’m going to use that in my next piece!

    • Paula said:

      If 75% if women have the linea nigra that means 25% don’t. George V decided that the home secretary didn’t need to be at his daughters first birth and none have been there since. There is no doubt they used a surrogate egg donor because its common in the medical fields is that real doctors or the paranoid delusional moron brigade??? There is no evidence that this child wasn’t produced the old fashioned way sex between husband and wife. The main thrust of this argument is I don’t like Kate there for she is sterile stupid stupid stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • royalgossippsychotic said:

        As much as I disagree, I am glad you were here and posted this comment. You have a point, but really, it is an interesting theory.

      • royalgossippsychotic said:

        PS. There’s a reason this website is called “Royal Gossip Psychotic,” LOL 🙂

      • toomanyspiders said:

        I have had 7 children and don’t have a linea nigra nor do I have a single stretch mark on my abdomen. However I do believe kate has an eating disorder so if they used a surrogate it may have been due to that. The surrogate would not have known whom she was carrying for so it wouldn’t have involved a wide conspiracy. However, kate did obviously gain some weight toward the end of her(?) pregnancy and some women do bounce back very quickly.

    • comeonpeople said:

      Didn’t Kate have an ovary removed in her teens? I know I read this a long time ago, before they were married. Now that George’s brown eyes are apparent – I do not think she is the biological mother. I don’t know if she faked the pregnancy, but I think she used a donor egg. Maybe that is what the nurse found out about. Horrible if she was murdered.

      • Bronte said:

        My cousin had an ovary removed and guess what? she has given birth to two healthy babies without any kind of hormone therapy..This is all BS due to hate and jealousy oh and btw,I have the same coloring as Kate and at 5’2 I did not have one stretch mark was back in my skinny size 3’s in just two days after birthing my 8 pound baby boy and one more thing I did not have a linea nigra..Kate is tall and woman who have some height usually do not show until later in their pregnancies..

      • comeonpeople said:

        Bronte you did not address my points at all.
        Only one ovary can affect fertility.
        George has brown eyes.
        Kate used a donor egg – probably her sister’s.

  5. michelle said:

    interesting article! i wasn’t sure about beyonce! and not sure about kate either! had two very different pregnancies myself but one thing is for sure-you do not bounce into a car like she did within hours or days of giving birth (c-section or natural)! that was the biggest error!

  6. michelle said:

    by the way it was the angle of the sky camera- not bbc cameras so check out their footage!

  7. Michelle Marrison said:

    Would be so amazing to have narrow hips, a flat tummy and no stretch marks so soon after giving birth

    • hellen Jones said:

      I gave birth to a 7lb2oz baby on the 1st of the month, my waistline was 34 the day before giving birth. Four weeks later I was 24ins without the line or the stretch marks. So not all ladies suffer the belly bulge or stretch marks. Oh and I am a brunette.

      • royalgossippsychotic said:

        *snicker* Duchess Kate is that you?

      • Bronte said:

        Thank-you Helen some ppl are just looking for something that is not there this is all made up nonsense.I wish there was an edit button so I could correct my post above..

  8. Sue Allen said:

    When the news about Kate’s pregnancy was announced and that she was suffering from a serious condition HG, at was surprising to see her feeling well within a short period of time and attending events. During her 9 month pregnancy, she was putting on cloths and shoes that can be considered harmful to the unborn baby, skinny tight jeans, high heeled stilletos, tight dresses and skirts. Sometimes her tummy looked flat and then all of sudden she looked big

  9. Paula Burton said:

    By the way for there to be a Queen Beatrice next is for five princes to either abdicate or die.as for that line 75% of women get it meaning 25% don’t even so airbrushing can gat rid of that as for springing back many women do that

  10. Kristeen said:

    Thanks for one’s marvelous posting! I really enjoyed reading it, you
    can be a great author.I will be sure to bookmark your blog
    and will often come back down the road. I want to encourage that you continue your great job, have a
    nice holiday weekend!

  11. Sue said:

    There is no doubt that a surrogate/egg donor was used. It is an open secret in London medical circles, too many loose tongues. Kate was having unsuccessful IVF treatment when the nudigate scandal broke. Carole Middleton frantically wanted to restore her daughter’s reputation and as she couldn’t get pregnant the botched surrogacy idea was conceived. The surrogate is actually named on the web and you can see pictures of her with George on the realroyalgossip site plus all over the web. George is the spitting image of the surrogate/donor with her beautiful big brown eyes. Those who followed the alleged ‘pregnancy’ knew from the start that it was a sham for the reasons given above and more. Her foam bump (details and pictures on the net) kept changing size and deflated, dented and inflated according to whatever activity was performed.

    The problem now is that as the baby was not born of the body of the wife of the legal heir to the throne he is not the true successor.
    There is also talk that it wasn’t William’s sperm used. This is the reason for the odd distancing of the RF from George and the Middletons also the very strange Christening with many of the senior Royals missing. The truth is already out there but unfortunately for the moment the British papers are gagged. There is a deafening silence from the Palace and no denials issued from either them or the known surrogate/egg donors family. It will come out and the implications will be catastrophic.

    • Millie said:

      Good post Sue, totally agree. So, as alleged by so many people, world wide now, if a surrogate´s eggs were used and she carried and gave birth to the child, then this child cannot, by law, be a legitimate heir because (a) he was not “born of the body” of kate, and also (b) because of the high possibility he would not have the genetics of kate, bill middleton or both (on the assumption that bill middleton did not provide the sperm). This situation really needs to be investigated by the relevant authority at the highest level and the full truth to be revealed, not some trumped up false information either. The public deserve better than that. It is the world of the internet, nothing can be hidden any more. It is not enough for the royal family to lie low and hope this goes away, going away it is not, in fact there is more gossip, rumour and speculation now than there has ever been. The child is rarely seen – once in a blurry snapshot taken by pa middleton – the dog was dominating the photo – why?, second time the christening where it was obvious, in the opinion of many commenters on newspaper coverage, that the official photographer had photoshopped the childs face, particularly the eyes. As for the foam bump, it moved around so much I felt quite light-headed – up, down, left, right, centre. The most telling thing, in my opinion, regarding this alleged “pregnancy” was kate at her final “pre birth” event – Trooping of the Colour. If you look at this link, 11th photo down, camzilla/Harry and kate in the carriage together, the bump seems to have virtually disappeared – how is that possible on a woman supposedly 8 months pregnant?

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2342119/Kate-Middleton-pregnant-Duchess-Cambridge-joins-Camilla-Trooping-Colour.html.

      A lot to be investigated surrounding the arrival of this child. In my opinion, nothing that happened from the alleged conception through to birth, leads me to think kate conceived and birthed him. There is a lot of information out there, as Sue above said, but although the UK press are gagged, the European and International press are not.

      • Bronte said:

        Well how pathetic it was poor Harry for years saying that Charles was not his bio father well all I can say about that is put a picture of Harry next to Diana’s sister Sarah and it will blow you away..I am 100% postitive that he is Charles and Diana’s son..As far as George goes here we go again making up lies that will haunt this child all of his life..He looks just like Wills at that age and guess what he got his big brown eyes from Kate’s side ..Geesh! ppl think before you start spewing gossip like this think about George if possible

  12. Millie said:

    Good post Sue, totally agree. So, as alleged by so many people, world wide now, if a surrogate´s eggs were used and she carried and gave birth to the child, then this child cannot, by law, be a legitimate heir because (a) he was not “born of the body” of kate, and also (b) because of the high possibility he would not have the genetics of kate, bill middleton or both (on the assumption that bill middleton did not provide the sperm). This situation really needs to be investigated by the relevant authority at the highest level and the full truth to be revealed, not some trumped up false information either. The public deserve better than that. It is the world of the internet, nothing can be hidden any more. It is not enough for the royal family to lie low and hope this goes away, going away it is not, in fact there is more gossip, rumour and speculation now than there has ever been. The child is rarely seen – once in a blurry snapshot taken by pa middleton – the dog was dominating the photo – why?, second time the christening where it was obvious, in the opinion of many commenters on newspaper coverage, that the official photographer had photoshopped the childs face, particularly the eyes. As for the foam bump, it moved around so much I felt quite light-headed – up, down, left, right, centre. The most telling thing, in my opinion, regarding this alleged “pregnancy” was kate at her final “pre birth” event – Trooping of the Colour. If you look at this link, 11th photo down, camzilla/Harry and kate in the carriage together, the bump seems to have virtually disappeared – how is that possible on a woman supposedly 8 months pregnant?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2342119/Kate-Middleton-pregnant-Duchess-Cambridge-joins-Camilla-Trooping-Colour.html.

    A lot to be investigated surrounding the arrival of this child. In my opinion, nothing that happened from the alleged conception through to birth, leads me to think kate conceived and birthed him. There is a lot of information out there, as Sue above said, but although the UK press are gagged, the European and International press are not.

  13. Meritt said:

    Excellent work! As one of the pesky bloggers who commented on the “miracle birth” on the DM; it was a while before the DM would print anything in comments about these many points that you put fourth. I think it is essential to mention that I believe that the RF was well aware that waity was and still is unable to bear children, that is what the huge breakup was about. In order to keep the peace with Wills, ie you took my Mum, I will have the bride I choose…regardless. Waity for Diana. There is very little that Harry and Wills, as adults cannot do because of the original, shady act. I would really like to see things differently, but given the evidence I have a difficult time seeing things otherwise.

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      Thanks! I’ll be improving on this and launching myself on Yahoo! Contributor and I’ll be happy to reach a wider audience.

  14. cate said:

    nonsense

  15. LBJC Underwear (@LBJCunderwear) said:

    Surrogate or not, Prince William failed big time in choosing Kate. They can do all the PR stunt to sell her to the public but her stink will still come out. What scary is the Middletons is set to get it all through Prince William and Prince George.

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      You know, I wonder how on earth he didn’t see the danger signals that something wasn’t right with her. One being a decade long holiday, but the real issue was her inability to get on with his friends. Even after so many years, she is still shunned by them.

  16. Studying Surrogacy said:

    Great post! Been reading a lot about different surrogacy situations recently. Thanks for the info!

  17. Margaret said:

    Just before the birth, Kate was filmed launching a ship, I believe, and she was a lot fatter in the face than normal. How can this be if she wasn’t pregnant? Cheek fillers could have been used but her whole countenance was fuller in the face.

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      You have a good point, but in a candid photo, Kate was seen getting groceries and she was tick thin and gaunt in the face. When it was published the RF went into a frenzy of outrage over Kate supposedly getting her privacy violated.

    • Mary Denny said:

      Taking any number of drugs, mainly cortisone, would produce a “moonface’ look, I’m sure Carole Middleton got all the facts together from the doctors in Switzerland that did Kate’s abortion in 2007.

  18. robertadennis2013 said:

    Yes, the baby was bigger than her stomach ever was. She went gray because of this.

  19. Smithe82 said:

    Thanks so much for sharing this excellent info! I’m seeking forward to see much more posts! cfcfebfgbdbgadba

  20. autumn Young said:

    1) you don’t have to give up wearing heels while pregnant.
    2) some women don’t “eat for two” and end up becoming obese whales
    3) just because she is breastfeeding, doesn’t mean she can’t drink. A lot of obstetricians encourage a new mother to drink dark beer to help their milk come in….also, you can pump and dump.
    4) why are you so desperate to find some kind of fault in her method of taking care of HER body and HER family?

    • sholux said:

      There are NO British or American obstetricians that encourage new mothers to drink dark beer and Kate’s cart was filled with wine

      No one has to be desperate to find fault with the Mansons. They’re already shady.

      She stomach didn’t grow large enough by a long shot to have carried a 8 LB 6 OZ baby (George’s official birth weight)

      George has BROWN eyes, a dominant eye color that no one on his side for two generations carries so cannot be passed down to him

      • sholux said:

        *Her

      • comeonpeople said:

        Yes, it is the brown eyes that will be the undoing of the hoax.
        I’ve notice some internet photos are now browning in Kate’s eyes lol!
        If she used a donor egg but carried the baby herself, does that count?

      • Feliciti said:

        This is so silly. She didn’t have to be buying the alcohol for herself. The most elementary thinking skills would come in handy here.

      • sholux said:

        It does come in handy which is why we’re not like most idiots deluding ourselves into believing two people with recessive eye coloring a had a child with a dominant eye coloring.

      • Paula said:

        The eye colour issue is more complicated than first thought, it is now known that there is a 1 in 4 chance of green eyed an blue eyed parents having brown eyed ofspring

  21. Fed Up said:

    Today is George’s first birthday. He does NOT look anything like Will or Kate, except having blonde hair like Will did as a baby. I strongly doubt that George is the child of either one of them.

  22. Marilyn said:

    It is widely rumored that Beyonce used a surrogate but didn’t want the world to know that for whatever reason and chose to wear a pregnancy prop instead, which failed miserably. It is wide rumored that she took the steroid drug prednisone in the last weeks of her “pregnancy” to make her face fuller and to give her ankles that pregnancy look.

    The rumor is that Kate indeed cannot and never will be able to give birth to a child because she was not born female. She has the physique of a male. Now if this is true, of all the woman Prince William could have chosen why would he pick this one? Very interesting indeed…….

    • WOW said:

      Seriously? This IS news.

  23. sholux said:

    Well now we’ve seen the kid and those brown eyes didn’t come either Kate or William and he favors neither one of them nor anyone on either sides of their families.

    • comeonpeople said:

      right! It drives me crazy when science is not paid attention to! Green eyes and blue eyes do not make brown eyes. Sorry. It is possible that Wills has a broken brown eye gene that was carried down thru his family (with all the inbreeding), but still each person before him on up to the original broken dominant gene would have only a 25% chance of passing it on. AND ND AND Kate would need to have the same broken brown eyed gene (by broken I mean it can’t express, so the person has blue eyes) in order for George to have brown eyes. That confounds the odds to almost impossible. If the couple next have adorable twin girls (the press is already feeding us the possibility) then we know she used donor eggs . The only way to insure a first born male and then two cute little twin girls is with IVF… I doubt they will make the same mistake with the egg donor eye color genes the next time around.

  24. Christinne Radu said:

    Excellent piece of work, thank u. That also goes for countless showbiz women who look impeccable shortly after birth. No matter the life regimen u have (after that), no matter how good ur genes are, still impossible to look like nothing happened after u were preggers.

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      Right; follow me on my Twitter account.

  25. Christinne Radu said:

    And dont forget its the 2nd time Zio-owned media announced Kate’s pregnancy, a couple of months before they said she had twin girls and after a few days, that she miscarried and now, like in a fairy-tale, shes pregnant and again has HG…. Ud say she had sex like crazy after that “miscarriage”, in order to make up for the “lost babies”. And I dont know why I find weird the fact that they hired a Spanish nanny for their “son”….

    • WoW said:

      If she is not pregnant, what exactly is she doing now? Is she just hiding?

      • Christinne Radu said:

        Follow the Zio-owned media and u will see. Yes, it seems shes hiding for now.

      • kitty said:

        Do you guys honestly think SNES using a surrogate?

  26. Pam said:

    I think Prince George looks like Kate’s father, so maybe the donor egg came from Pippa ? That would explain the brown eyes. I cannot see the royal family allowing donor sperm though, Prince William must be the dad.

  27. Leslie Kenyon said:

    I have to say that it is suspicious that again she has to go into hiding at the beginning of her pregnancy and they moved to a more remote place right before this announcement. If she is using a surrogate this time, then they have planned it well.

  28. 0jr said:

    so does he call the guy cousin or uncle dad

  29. cheryl said:

    George, Kate and Pippa have hazel eyes, get over it! Kate and Wills are so individual of the royal family if they needed to use a surrogate they would not feel the need to hide it.

    • Christinne Radu said:

      Yeah, and pigs fly

    • Lazy Kate said:

      No he doesn’t, and Kate’s eyes are GREEN. Quite a difference between green and hazel, cheryl. Maybe YOU get over it? Truth hurts doesn’t it? Awh.

    • Lazy Kate said:

      And who cares about dull, boring, no talent Pippa? Who cares what her eyes look like?

      • comeonpeople said:

        Because she is the egg donor. Pay attention!
        I think it is fine that her sister donated an egg for another sister. Too bad the monarchy doesn’t think it as sweet.

  30. Christinne Radu said:

    http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1065819-kate-middleton-pregnancy-expecting-a-girl-but-had-secret-collapse-report-says/

  31. Christinne Radu said:

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/fashion/kates-maternity-style/ss-BBdEpWo

  32. Christinne Radu said:

    https://www.yahoo.com/parenting/are-kate-middletons-high-heels-dangerous-for-her-104773782127.html

  33. Bronte said:

    You ppl are some sick ,jealous,low life bottom feeders do not worry I will never be back to this witch hunt that you mother fuckers have started up about this family..Shame on all of you!

    • Christinne said:

      Its hard when ur bubble breaks, Bronte, we understand u. Keep worshipping ur royal parasites and believe everything Zio media is telling u, be the same obedient sheeple as always. See how stupid u are? How can we be jealous of a bunch of rich parasites, inbreeders, criminals, pedophiles, satanists and absolute scums?

  34. Pingback: Kate Middleton Surrogate Pregnancy In India | Surrogacy Chat

  35. Christinne said:

    I wonder how is the surrogate doing….

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3061919/Duchess-looks-set-May-baby.html

  36. dopey45q said:

    you know. i read everything that was printed on this site and i must say i find it utterly fascinating. i always believe where there is smoke there is fire. and there is just something strange and plastic about this girl kate. until it can proven otherwise, i think these articles make a lot of sense indeed.

  37. Feliciti said:

    That’s not how it works. Until these ludicrous allegations can be proved, they should not be made.

    • Second fake royal heir said:

      Kate is infertile – I have known this about 7 or 8 years. Whoopsie – shouldn’t have mentioned that.

    • comeonpeople said:

      two recessive genes can’t make a kid with a dominant gene.
      For both parents to have a broken dominant gene , the odds would be astronomical and mathematically impossible.

  38. ReinaGirl said:

    Was there ever a part 2 to this artile?

    • royalgossippsychotic said:

      I run my own business, which is why don’t write often.

  39. Pam Thompson said:

    ummmm…….I was 6 stone 10lbs when I was full term with my son. I was very fit too. I gave birth to him (7lbs 3oz) and within 2 days, was back into my normal clothing with no sign of a belly. He was my first child. It is possible.

  40. Christinne Radu said:

    https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/everyone-sworn-secrecy-details-george-191852903.html

  41. Check your facts please said:

    The Home Secretary hasn’t been present at royal births since Prince Charles was born in 1948 so please don’t imply that this is the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge breaking protocol, as protocol had already long been broken on this. This was widely reported while she was pregnant and while she was in labour with a Prince George. She had four doctors there, as well as several midwives and of course Prince William. I think they might have noticed if she wasn’t actually pregnant!

    • royal gossip psychotic said:

      This is just a gossip website, nothing more, nothing less.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: